Week 4: functions, arrays, and critique

Brent Schuetze

Semester 2, 2023

admin

assignment 1 is done, congratulations everyone! We will be busy marking the submissions and aim to get feedback back to you within 2 weeks

assignment 2 is available from tomorrow—due 9pm first Monday of the teaching break.

after that there is one further assignment…

…and then the major project!

My last lecture, next week will be Ushini!

recap

  • specifying positions & colours with numbers
  • drawing with the p5 library (drawing rect()s and ellipse()s, setting fill() and stroke() colours)
  • using variables (and maybe even declaring your own)
  • doing simple maths with +, -, *, /
  • doing things conditionally with if statements and Boolean expressions like mouseX < 100
  • looping with while and for

code theory

variable scope (a new word for something you’ve seen before)

functions (including making our own functions)

arrays (collections of things)

scope

scope is related to flow—it’s a way of talking about which bits of code can “see” each other

if you ever get “missing variable” errors, but you can see (i.e. with your eyes) the variable in your code, you might have a scope problem

global scope

variable declarations “outside” of all the functions (e.g. setup() and draw()) are said to be in the global scope, and they’re visible from anywhere in the program

// x is a "global" variable
let x = 200;

function setup() {
  createCanvas(800, 600);
}

function draw() {
  ellipse(x, x, x, x);
}

but what about this?

function setup() {
  createCanvas(800, 600);
  let x = 200;
}

function draw() {
  ellipse(x, x, x, x);
}

if something’s not working

check the console

how about this?

function setup() {
  createCanvas(800, 600);
}

function draw() {
  let x = 200;
  ellipse(x, x, x, x);
}

this works because x is in the draw function’s scope—it’s visible inside draw’s curly brackets, but not outside

scoping tips

scoping might cause frustration at first, but it’s actually a good thing—isolation makes our code clearer & more robust

in general, having lots of global variables is bad coding style—variables should only be visible (in scope) where they’ll be used

the brackets matter!

{ } [ ] ( )

concept 2: functions

first, some definitions…

function (noun): the act of executing or performing any duty, office, or calling; performance https://www.wordnik.com/words/function

function (noun): a sequence of program instructions that perform a specific task, packaged as a unit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subroutine

anatomy of a function (recap)

name(parameter1, parameter2, ...);

rect(100, 100, 100, 100);

the name (in this case rect) specifies what to do

the parameters (in the brackets) tell the function how to do it, e.g. where to draw the rect and how big

together, they allow us to tell the computer do some basic thing, repeatedly, and with slight differences each time

speak the lingo

we say we “call” a function because we’re telling it to do its’ job (like the staff at a restaurant)

how many jobs should a function have?

the “you had one job” principle is important for functions!

talk

rect(100, 100, 100, 100);

how do you find out what the parameters mean?

check the rect() reference

writing your own functions

you’ve been using functions all along: setup() and draw(), as well as all the p5 functions like ellipse()

You can write your own functions where you get to pick the parameters & what they’re called. Here’s an example polkadot() function

function polkadot(x, y){
  fill(255,0,0);
  ellipse(x, y, 20, 20);
}

let’s try it out

creating functions that give back values

parameters allow us to send values (parameters) in to a function, how do we get values back out?

the answer: we use a return statement in the body of the function

function double(x) {
  return x * 2;
}

now we can use our function like this

background(double(50));

p5 has a few other “special” functions

special from a flow perspective, anyway

and a few more…

read the reference!

I really don’t mean to harp on about this, but if you can’t read the reference then you’ll really have trouble

MDN has some great docs on Functions

we’ll use functions constantly for the rest of the course, so it’s really worth getting your head around them

sometimes when we’re referring to a function (in writing) we write “the background() function”

note the lack of parameters in between the brackets, even though the background() function does take parameters

this is because there are many different ways to call that function (e.g. with one number, with two numbers, etc.) so using a () with no arguments is just a general way to acknowledge that it’s a function (but to see exactly what parameters it requires you’ll need to look in the reference)

example: making a button

from this week’s labs: making a simple “button” has two sub-tasks:

  1. drawing the button
  2. figuring out whether the button is clicked

these sub-tasks require the same info, though: where and how big is the button?

let’s combine them into a function which

  1. draws a rectangle
  2. returns a Boolean (either true or false depending on whether the button is being clicked)

concept 3: arrays

we’ve already met the Number, String and Boolean types in this course

let myNumber = 7;
let myString = "tennis is fun";
let myBoolean = true;

Can we collect some of these things together into a group?

what do you think these are?

let arrayOfNumbers = [100, 24, -2, 18, 106, 42, 1, 8];
let arrayOfStrings = ["hello", "darkness",
                      "my", "old", "friend"];
let arrayOfBooleans = [true, false, true, true, false];
let arrayOfWhatever = [100, 200, false, "Banana"];
let emptyArray = [];

they’re arrays

again, look for the matching pairs

when you see a [, there will be a matching ]

everything inside will be initialised as the elements of the array

some new vocabulary

the array is the whole collection

each member of the array is called an element

the “element position” is called the index (e.g. the first element is at index 0, the second at index 1, etc.)

the number of elements in the array is called the length of the array

what’s going on here?

let allTheThings = [0, 120, 500];

we’re declaring a variable called allTheThings, and initialising it to be an array with 3 elements: 0, 120 and 500

arrays as variables

// < variable part >  < array part >
   let allTheThings = [0, 120, 500];

we’re combining something we’re learning today (arrays) with something we learned in week 2 (declaring & initialising variables)

no magic here!

why use arrays?

arrays are a really useful part of javascript

as well as just declaring & initialising an array, there are a bunch of things you can do to it by default

  • find out how big it is
  • add/remove/modify elements
  • join it to other arrays
  • look for particular elements in the array
  • etc.

the Array reference is on MDN, but several p5 functions use arrays as well

oddNumbers array

for the following slides, assume we’ve got an array oddNumbers with some stuff in it

let oddNumbers = [1, 2, 3, 5, 7];

using the elements in an array

use square brackets to “reference” (i.e. retrieve) an element from an array

let firstOddNumber = oddNumbers[0];
let secondOddNumber = oddNumbers[1];

background(oddNumbers[3]);

array referencing gotchas

the array index starts at 0, so oddNumbers[0] is the first element, and oddNumbers[n] is the n+1th element for any index n

if you try and access an element that isn’t there, the result is undefined

// this will break because there is no 40th element
background(oddNumbers[40]);

can we change the things in arrays?

putting elements into an array

to put an element onto the “end”, use push()

oddNumbers.push(53);
// oddNumbers is now [1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 53]

to put an element onto the “front”, use unshift() (weird name)

oddNumbers.unshift(-7);
// oddNumbers is now [-7, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 53]

removing elements from an array

to remove an element from the “end”, use pop() (opposite of push())

oddNumbers.pop();
// oddNumbers is now [-7, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7]

to remove an element from the “front”, use shift() (oppposite of unshift())

oddNumbers.shift();
// oddNumbers is now [1, 2, 3, 5, 7]

here’s a table

let things = [1, 2, 3];
  add remove
front things.unshift(value) things.shift()
back things.push(value) things.pop()

modifying the elements in an array

similar to using the elements of the array (e.g. oddNumbers[0]) but this time we assign a new value to that element using the equals sign

// oddNumbers is [1, 2, 3, 5, 7];
oddNumbers[4] = 12;
// oddNumbers is now [1, 2, 3, 5, 12];

talk

suppose you see this:

let allTheThings = [0, 120, 500];

// some code here you can't see

allTheThings.push(50);

what are the elements of allTheThings at this point? how do you know?

how do I see what’s in my array at any point?

use print and the console!

// put this somewhere in your code
print(oddNumbers);

then, open up the console and see! (cmd ⌘+alt+J or ctrl+alt+J)

arrays in arrays

remember how we said you could put any type into an array? that includes more arrays!

let nestedArray = [[1, 3], [2, 4]];

nestedArray[0] // the value at index 0 is the Array [1, 3]

nestedArray[0][1] // what do you think this is?

“looping” over an array

the for loop from last week’s lecture can be used to generate the indexes

for(let i = 0; i < oddNumbers.length; i = i+1){
  doStuff(oddNumbers[i]);
}

How do we know if art is good?

How do we judge art?

(Wrong answers only.)

Ok, so is there any better way than just guessing?

E.g., maybe you like something, but how do you know I will like it?

... but is it art?

Jackson Pollock (1912-1956)

Blue poles [Number 11, 1952]

1952

enamel and aluminium paint with glass on canvas

212.1 (h) x 488.9 (w) cm

Nation Gallery of Australia

Very expensive, one of the most expensive that they bought at the time

People looked at it and were like, what that’s not art, it’s just splashes! How can it be worth that amount of money

but if you have tools, you can start to appreciate it

three ways to judge a work of art

ethical: is it good for the world?

poetic: is it made well?

aesthetic: is it beautiful?

Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible. London: Continuum.

ethics

Plato argues that artworks are lies that deceive us from truth

Roman copy of a portrait bust by Silanion for the Academia in Athens

c. 370 BC

ethics

Images can deceive

Imagine this…

Bill Posters

2019

link

Artworks created using ML to create deepfake-esque images and videos

faked by the artist to show Zuck making a comment on the influence and ‘evil’ness of facebook to bring about social commentary around the platform. The deceit was part of the artwork and ethical aspect.

cw

next slide has an explicit image on it, turn away for now if you don’t want to see it

ethics

Portrait of an Aboriginal girl

Union Hotel Fitzroy, Melbourne

Photo by Liz Conor

the politics of Aboriginal kitsch

artwork on the wall in a pub. In the style of aboriginal kitsch which was a 20th century series of artworks that were basically fake representations of what aboriginal people were like and what they did.

They were fake because they were constructed by western people trying to evoke a child-like representation of what aboriginal people were like and supporting the notion of what the colonials had been doing (they’re a childish people and need to be looked after)

This person doesn’t exist. They were created to show a native girl who is unashamed about not having her top on (which would be considered shameful in a western society)

poetics

Aristotle says that if a lie is made well, it can help heal our stress/anxiety

Roman copy of a Greek bronze bust of Aristotle by Lysippos

c. 330 BC

marble with modern alabaster mantle

poetics

tv, movies and games are the most consumed kind of art. They certainly have a high poetic value.

this is an example from Endgame. A very interesting set piece, but there is nothing really there, just special effects.

a lot of ‘lies’ and poetics go into these things to make them great. But a lot of the time these big franchise/blockbuster movies etc. lean very heavily into poetics, but aren’t doing anything ‘good’ for the world, and while potentially fantastical to look at, aren’t beautiful either.

Avengers Endgame (link)

2019

Directed by Anthony Russo and Joe Russo

Aesthetics

Imannuel Kant (1724 - 1804) said beauty is the measure

we can feel an artwork’s beauty/ugliness, sublimity and humour, balance, harmony and dissonance

the better the work, the more emotional response we can have to it

If something is truly beautiful, we all agree

this is one such artwork where everyone seems to agree that it has a beauty to it.

you can achieve this too in your submissions! everything fits together well and conscious choices were made in its construction

Caspar David Friedrich (1774-1840)

Wanderer above the Sea of Fog

1818

Kunsthalle Hamburg

critiquing art

most critiques of art address one or a mix of these three concerns

  • is it good for the world? (ethical)
  • is it made well? (poetics)
  • is it beautiful? (aesthetics)

In COMP1720/6720 these criteria apply as well! How does the quality of code, and the quality of interaction map into these values?

further reading/watching

Shiffman on Arrays intro arrays & loops (note that Shiffman covers topics in a slightly different order to us)

MDN Function reference

MDN Array reference

MDN article on Indexed Collections

questions?