The studio crit model

How a studio crit works and how it's marked: the five beats of the session, the feedback protocol, and the two marks each week carries

The weekly crit is the core mechanic of this course: reflection-with-others, the one kind of reflection you can’t practise alone. A good crit comment and a good failing test are the same kind of thing, being specific, early, and aimed at the artefact rather than the author.

For times, rooms and each week’s provocation, see the crits page; for the assignments and the assessment policy, see assessment.

What you bring#

A deployed prototype, live at its public URL, and your written reflection, submitted by the cutoff. The assessment page has the reflection prompts and the rest of the submission detail. Come ready to account for how you directed, grounded and corrected the agent to produce the work.

The prototype is frozen at the cutoff, two hours before your session.

The session#

Ninety minutes in five beats: fifteen minutes on your crit agent’s prototype, five dealing the pods, thirty critiquing each other’s work, thirty on the riff, ten to close out.

The agent crit#

The session opens on your crit agent’s prototype for the week, on screen, critiqued by everyone with your tutor driving. Its PROCESS.md goes up alongside it. Nobody has to defend this one, which makes it the place to practise the Ladder out loud before you turn it on each other, and it’s the fork every pod riffs on later.

Pod allocation#

Pods come out at four, dealt on the day from whoever turned up. Each pod picks a pod leader in its first minute: someone who hasn’t led lately, who keeps the pod to time, holds the house rules when a critique tips towards a pile-on, and takes the keyboard for the riff.

The pod crit#

Half an hour in your pod, and everybody presents. You show your deployed prototype at its live URL, next to whatever you started the week from, and take the pod’s critique. Open with thirty seconds on your breakthrough, straight from your written reflection, so the work is framed before any opinion lands.

If the week got away from you and there’s nothing live, say so when the pod comes round to you. The critique, the riff and the contribution mark don’t depend on having shipped.

Critique follows the Ladder of Feedback:

1. Clarify: ask questions until you understand what they built and were going for. Don’t critique a thing you’ve misread.
2. Value: say what’s genuinely good, and be specific. “The reveal on scroll is the whole joke and it lands” beats “nice”.
3. Raise concerns: put them as honest questions. “What happens if the form submits twice?” rather than “the form’s broken”.
4. Suggest: offer a next step. “Where would you take it next?” is a gift.

One house rule on top, from Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process: the presenter drives, and opinions come with the presenter’s consent (“I have a thought about the colour, want it?”).

The riff#

Then you build. Every pod starts from the same fork, your crit agent’s prototype for the week, and mob-programs its own agent to take it past where its author left it. The pod leader is at the keyboard; everyone else scopes the plan, critiques each output with the Ladder, or tests what the agent ships against the running thing.

The brief is the same every week and deliberately open: given everything you just watched, how far can you take this prototype in the time you have? A riff that ends as a plan and a first failing test is still a legitimate riff.

The riff runs on the pod leader’s key, so leading spends a session’s worth of their own usage allocation. Leading a pod therefore raises your weekly cap to $120 for the rest of the semester. There is nothing to claim: your tutor records who led and the convenor raises your cap.

Close-out#

Each pod shares back with a quick demo of the riff, naming the ideas it built on and where it got past the prototype it started from. Then your tutor names the week’s hall-of-fame pick.

When a week runs differently#

Most weeks from 2 to 8 answer a shared brief on a fresh prototype and run to the shape above. Two kinds of week don’t.

Weeks 4 and 7 follow the two static assignments and carry no fresh brief: you present the breakthrough from the assignment you just shipped, in the Assignment 1 retro and the Assignment 2 retro.

Weeks 9 to 11 work on your final project rather than a new build, pushing the in-flight repository past that week’s process lens: proof of life, then critique, then instrumentation. The mark follows how you worked that lens, never the state of the in-flight project.

Each week’s crit brief says how its session runs, and where a brief differs from this page, the brief wins.

The hall of fame#

Your tutor picks one standout from the week and it goes into a public hall of fame. It carries no marks. Most weeks it’s also where Thursday’s lecture demo finds its raw material. Your crit agent’s prototype is eligible alongside everyone else’s.

How the marks work#

In-crit prototype marks#

Each crit is worth 2%, split evenly into two marks scored independently within an attended crit. The tutor records both and uploads them to Canvas within 48 hours of the crit finishing. There’s no take-home re-marking loop.

Attendance is a condition of the whole crit: if you do not attend a session that week, both marks are zero, even if you shipped a prototype by the cutoff. Attending means the whole session — the pod work and the critique are most of what the contribution mark is judged on, so arriving well after the start or leaving well before the end will cost you that mark even though you were in the room. If you know in advance that you’ll miss part of a session, tell your tutor beforehand.

• 1 mark — shipped at the cutoff. Three things when the course’s automated sweep runs, and all three: you pushed to your repo; what you pushed was live at its derived URL; that week’s entry was in your reflections/ folder.

  • 1 — all three, and your checks had gone green by the time the sweep ran
  • 0.5 — all three, but your checks weren’t green: red, still running, or no checks at all
  • 0 — any one of the three missing

• 1 mark — your contribution.

  • 1 — you took part: you presented your prototype to your pod (or, with nothing live, gave a frank account of the week), gave your pod real critique, worked the riff, and could account for how your agent produced the work when asked
  • 0.5 — you were there, but gave none of that
  • 0 — you weren’t there, which makes the whole crit zero

  Your tutor sets it from the session, not your repository: how polished the prototype is doesn’t come into it.

The sweep starts fifteen minutes after your cutoff and captures each repo in your group in turn: your last push and the commit it served, whether the site is up, whether the reflection is there, screenshots at both marking viewports, and your checks’ CI status. What it finds is the state of record. Those fifteen minutes are settling time for the deploy and the CI run your push triggers, which is why “still running” counts the same as red, and why a push inside the window spends the time your own deploy was about to need.

The sweep also inlines your PROCESS.md and that week’s reflection alongside the screenshots, so your written work reaches your tutor before you present. Neither is graded weekly: the reflection counts as present or not, and PROCESS.md is read properly at the assignments.

Nothing live? Still come. If the build never happened, say so when your pod comes round to you. The “shipped” mark is 0 that week, but you can still get the full mark for your contribution. Your written reflection is still due at the cutoff. Running /ship after the sweep brings your site up so you can demo it in the crit, but you don’t get that mark back. That’s deliberate — shipping is a non-negotiable, and it’s better to learn that in a low-stakes crit rather than the final project.

On the two retro weeks there’s no fresh prototype, no reflection and no checks to read, so the shipped mark is a plain 1 or 0 on “the assignment’s PROCESS.md is written up in the repo by the cutoff” — the file you present the breakthrough from. Nobody grades the writing here, and the contribution mark reads the session as it does every other week.

The cutoff, two hours before your session starts, is the week’s down-tools point: your written work is due, your repo goes public (flipped by you, or already public in the final-project run), and the building stops. Come ready to present and discuss your work rather than still patching it. In the session you demo your live deployed URL.

Crit attendance#

Missing a crit means missing that week’s mark entirely, both halves. There’s no take-home credit for the artefact, however good it is. Telling us in advance that you’ll be absent does not by itself preserve the mark; attending a session does. Plan to attend every one.

If you know in advance you’ll miss your session, the fix is to attend another crit group’s session that same week, and it’s yours to arrange: message your tutor in a private Ed thread ahead of time and they’ll confirm which session you can join. If you arrive at a crit group you are not enrolled in without an approved swap, you’ll be turned away, because the rooms are full. The cutoff that applies is the one for the session you actually attend.

There’s no take-home or remote crit. A zero need not be the end of the story: you can recover one missed crit at the week 12 redeemable crit.

The week 12 redeemable crit#

One extra crit sits in week 12 to buy back a week you lost. It runs exactly like an ordinary crit, in person and live, marked on the same two halves, so the total lands between 0 and 2 in half-point steps. It’s open to everyone, with no form to fill in and no reason to give. You respond to any week’s provocation you like: it needn’t be one you missed, and fresh work is fine.

The mark you earn there replaces your lowest earlier crit mark, if that mark was 1 or below and the week 12 mark is higher. One crit, once: however many weeks you lost, it covers at most one, worth at most 2 percentage points.

If you already know you’ll have to miss a week, you’re welcome to treat week 12 as where you make it up rather than chasing a same-week swap. There’s nothing to arrange in advance; just turn up.

If a genuine, unavoidable disruption cost you more than the redeemable crit can cover, keep the supporting documentation and use ANU’s Extenuating Circumstances Application (ECA) process. An ECA must normally be lodged within five working days of the missed crit, and you do not need a tutor’s permission to apply. Any approved adjustment is handled through the applicable ANU process. Seek advice early.

Querying crit marks#

Queries run in two lanes, only one of them week-by-week.

• You were there and the record says you weren’t. Message your tutor in a private Ed thread within a week of the mark reaching Canvas and it’ll be corrected. This is the only week-by-week fix.
• Everything else, such as a shipped mark you think misreads the sweep or a contribution mark you think should have been a 1. These are heard once, at the end of semester: after the final crit’s marks are returned, start a private Ed thread to the convenor and we’ll review the record.

None of this limits your formal rights: the ANU appeals process remains available for any mark, on the University’s own deadlines.